Conference Presentations

In our presentation, we discuss our institution's accessibility best practices and how we aligned them with the Standard 8 of the QM Rubric. In our gap analysis, we found out that, even though Standard 8 does an excellent job to start the course accessibility process, full course accessibility status takes understanding WCAG 2.1 guidelines and their correlation to Standard 8 of the QM Rubric.

This session describes the unique partnership of a college faculty member and a high school teacher as they gain expertise with the QM Rubric and peer review process before leading a statewide effort to create and certify a hybrid high school English course that will likely reach thousands of high school students across the state of California, and beyond.

This session will explain the benefits and rationale from applying QM framework to a course template in an LMS to embedded intelligent course design across all course delivery formats. Models and visual examples of how templates and course shells (pre-designed before faculty are added to courses) align with several Specific Review Standards from the QM Rubric.

Due to increasing demand for quality assurance in online courses, the Office of Academic Innovation at Towson University was tasked with developing and launching a system to ensure quality in online courses, and knew that QM would be the right place to start. Over two years, the team studied QM's Rubric and process and collaborated with faculty to develop the Gold Review system, a customized version of the original QM program.

Students recognize quality when they see it. Come learn how students view markers of quality online education and about a study that shows how they vote with their feet. You will walk away knowing how to communicate your quality to students.

Data is key for making decisions about learning effectiveness. Good surveys are key tools in producing such data. Come find out about a vast curated list of surveys and how they might help you collect the data you need!

In this session the presenters  will discuss various online learning tools that have been used to bring a very traditional course (Early British Literature) into the online era, and by using the QM Rubric as a blueprint for the online course, we were able to make substantial improvements to the seated/blended versions of this course as well.

In this presentation we will look at actual examples of how this weighty topic was approached in the online format, including entertaining mini lectures, online resources, and group discussion forums.     

With a higher expectation of quality in online courses, our department has found great success in implementing a standard prototype phase into the course development process. This allows developers to conceptualize and build a small portion of the course and conduct a review using the QM Rubric to catch potential quality issues/concerns before continuing development of the course. This session explores the prototype development, prototype review its impact on the quality of our online courses.

In October 2017, Athens State University embarked on an effort to increase adoption of QM throughout our campus.  While doing so, one rule was required - QM adoption had to be voluntary, not required.  With that, the university set off in an attempt to change the campus culture and view of quality online courses.  Since that time, we have had over 30+ classes QM certified by multiple unique faculty members with many more waiting in line to go through the process.

This session will share efforts to scale up PD opportunities for faculty at the system and campus level during COVID. Results gathered from a 29-item COVID faculty survey will be shared along with campus qualitative student feedback results.

UWF became a Quality Matters Institution in 2010. At that time, there was a concern among administrators that online courses were not meeting the same standards of quality as face-to-face courses.  In the early years, the QM team at UWF was focused on implementation--training reviewers and educating faculty on the benefits of a QM review.  After a very successful implementation period, where we have had 80 courses successfully reviewed, we are now moving into a new phase focused on data analysis of results.

In the wake of COVID-19, this mid-sized community college built capacity across campus constituencies in which many faculty had never operated outside their technical classroom where we moved instruction and operations fully online. We will share our professional development mobilization plan in which we built the capacity of remote instruction and learning by training more than 300 faculty, staff, student instructors, and tutors through emergency training in one week with follow-on training and support throughout the pandemic.

This session was presented by Dr David Shulman, Campus President, and Dr Yaping Gao, District Director of Instructional Design, from Broward College Online.

This presentation describes the organization, policy development, strategic initiatives, implementation, and assessment associated with establishing online learning at an urban, Land-grant, historically black university. We will showcase how a partnership with QM provided structure and a best practices model. The case will describe a four year strategic approach whereby online learning grew in a measured fashion through a collaborative approach among faculty, administrators and external partners. We will reflect upon challenges, successes, and sustainability.

How does QM align fractured processes into a cohesive QA program? Join a QA administrator, instructional designer, and online faculty member on the path from an unregulated Wild West online environment to a Modern era of structured course design and a review process that fully integrate QM standards. Review your own program, place it on the QM Continuum, and learn from other participants about their struggles and successes. This session will get you on the road of where you want to be with tips and tricks on how to arrive at your desired destination.

Before entering the career in online learning - in higher education, K-12, or CPE, graduate and professional students can build a deeper understanding and formal credential from QM through QM for Student program, as a head start.

Ever have the same Standards keep showing up as "Not Met" across multiple reviews? Join this presentation to discuss how those tricky standards can be addressed. This session will cover how results from the QM Peer Review process can be used to tackle those difficult standards and ensure quality of new course development. This study examined two sets of data regarding the quality of new online course design: Peer Reviewer and student perspectives. Results show some Standards are not met from both perspectives.

Hello? How are you? What do you need? How can we help? Anyone there? Do you feel like you are shouting into the abyss of the Internet and hoping your secondary students respond? This session will dive into unique ways educators can connect with virtual middle and high school learners. Tips for providing mental health supports, strategies for team building in live sessions and interventions for poor attendance will be discussed.

The session will teach participants how to use generative AI in a scaffolding manner to assist them to craft content alignment from the overall topic level down to a deeper dive into lesson creation. This skill is important because of the increasing workload demand of education professionals who need to know how to use emerging technologies in smart and efficient ways.