Conference Presentations

search by keyword

Introducing a Framework for Conducting QM-Focused Research

The trajectory of QM-focused research has been from describing experience and observations (such as impact on satisfaction), to exploring narrowing foci (such as interaction), to applying established educational frameworks (such as TPACK and CoI), to correlating data (such as grades).  The result is a rich foundational body of research, along with actionable information on the complexities of educational research.   To encourage researchers to benefit from these foundations, a framework for finding and using evidence on QM impact will be introduced during this poster session.

Introducing the QM Rubrics and Gaining Faculty Buy-in: Using Non-Threatning Approaches to Using the QM Rubrics

As a new subscriber to Quality Matters, we were interested in helping faculty and instructors who teach online use the QM rubrics in course development and revision in nonthreatening
ways. Pilots occurred in the Graduate Program in Nursing, Graduate Program in Education, and in a selection of online summer offerings in the Undergraduate program. This presentation will demonstrate the many ways that institutions might introduce the QM rubrics to their faculty in supportive and non-threatening ways.

Is it 85% Yet?

Master Reviewers and Facilitators, have you ever heard questions like these? How much is enough to pass a standard? How many items from the annotations should they have?How do you know that it’s 85%?  While facilitating QM Applying the Rubric workshops and chairing reviews, I find that participants and reviewers alike can be challenged when it comes to determining if individual Standards are met.

Is it Working? Stop Assuming, Start Assessing

Three years into our Online Teaching Fellows program, we were asked this question: Is it working? After an awkward silence and some shuffling of papers, we realized that we had been spending too much time assuming that it was working and not enough time assessing it. This session will introduce our assessment process and facilitate a discussion on how best to start meaningful assessment of a QM-centered professional development program.

It Makes Cents: Affordable In-House Captioning

Captioning video content can be an expensive and challenging endeavor, which can be difficult to accomplish on a large scale. To meet Standard 8.3, "The course provides alternative means of access to course materials," Oregon State University Ecampus developed an internal process to caption video and lecture content for courses going through a Quality Matters review. This session will focus on the process for easily and affordably creating captions for media.

It's Not You: Strategies for Engaging Faculty Around Alignment

Higher education faculty typically conceptualize alignment differently than instructional designers do. How can we engage faculty in effective discussions around this deeply essential aspect of course design? In this session we will discuss ways to support faculty toward stronger alignment by helping them to conceptualize a course as a thing apart from its designer. You will come away with new insights as well as practical tools to use when working with faculty.