Harvesting QM Benefits for Institutional Accreditation
This session was presented by Dr David Shulman, Campus President, and Dr Yaping Gao, District Director of Instructional Design, from Broward College Online.
This session was presented by Dr David Shulman, Campus President, and Dr Yaping Gao, District Director of Instructional Design, from Broward College Online.
All Hands on Deck! QM Coordinator Jam Session
Everyone agrees that quality course design is a good thing, and administration is supportive of QM as a process and rubric, but no one is mandating adherence to the process or standards. Now what? How do you get faculty interested and involved? This presentation covers the subtle and not so subtle ways which have worked for one institution.
The attached document was saved as PDF/A. If you have any difficulty accessing it, please feel free to contact the presenter directly for a copy.
Do you have faculty going in a multitude of directions with their online courses? Learn about our initial attempt to guide instructors with a nine-week online faculty development program to help them to transform their face-to-face courses into an online format that follows selected QM Standards. Review literature about evaluating the effectiveness of faculty development programs. Join in a discussion about introducing QM through faculty development and about methods to measure initial program impact.
A study that explores strategies to better meet the needs of university students participating in blended/hybrid courses will be presented and discussed. In this study, feedback from students on the challenges of participating in blended/hybrid courses was put into practice in 12 blended courses. Implications for blended course design and instruction will be explored with suggestions for some simple strategies to enhance the blended/hybrid course experience for all students.
Once upon a time, there was a small college in Westchester County, NY. They believed that quality did matter - and still does! Follow their journey...
We are fortunate to have buy-in from the top, which gives us the ability to try different things. But how do we extend it throughout the college, to all of our faculty, the instructional designers, and keep it going when people move on? Learn how a small institution, with a small online division, emraced QM in principle and is preparing to move forward.
Evangeline Varonis, The University of Akron
Jillian Jevack, Quality Matters
Michael Johanyak, The Univesity of Akron
QM is an excellent tool for assisting institutions with meeting regional accreditation requirements associated with online and hybrid learning. However, implementation of QM on a campus runs much more smoothly if faculty collaborate with staff and administrators on selection of the Rubric and on campus-wide adoption. This session reviews strategies for introducing the Rubric to faculty and discusses how faculty can be best utilized during the implementation process.
Three years into our Online Teaching Fellows program, we were asked this question: Is it working? After an awkward silence and some shuffling of papers, we realized that we had been spending too much time assuming that it was working and not enough time assessing it. This session will introduce our assessment process and facilitate a discussion on how best to start meaningful assessment of a QM-centered professional development program.
This website uses cookies for important user experience functions. Please review our Privacy Policy for more information.