Higher Education

Review of a course against the three-point Essential Specific Review Standards from the Essential Standards from the QM Higher Education Rubric, Seventh Edition and conducted by a Master Reviewer and a Peer Reviewer. All Essential Standards must be met to receive recognition, which is valid for five years. Courses not initially meeting Standards are eligible for an amendment process. Managed by the QM Coordinator or a certified Course Review Manager (CRM) in compliance with QM Course Review Policies and Processes.

Review of a course against the three-point Essential Specific Review Standards from the Essential Standards from the QM Higher Education Rubric, Seventh Edition and conducted by a Master Reviewer and a Peer Reviewer. All Essential Specific Review Standards must be met to receive recognition, which is valid for five years. Courses not initially meeting Standards are eligible for an amendment process.

This informal, not eligible for certification, review can be used by institutions wanting to benchmark their course design process or to determine professional development needs. The review uses a Master Reviewer that is also a subject matter expert. Choose this review type from the Course Review Application to get the process started.

Unofficial review of a course in its entirety managed by the member organization against all Specific Review Standards in the Higher Education Rubric. This type of review is not eligible for QM Certification.

Review of a previously certified course that is nearing the original 5 year certification expiration date or if any changes (outlined in the QM Recertification Policy) have been made to the course which requires a review to be conducted sooner.

Review of a previously certified course that is nearing the original 5 year certification expiration date or if any changes (outlined in the QM Recertification Policy) have been made to the course which requires a review to be conducted sooner.

Review of a previously certified course that is nearing the original 5 year certification expiration date or if any changes (outlined in the QM Recertification Policy) have been made to the course which requires a review to be conducted sooner.

Review of an alternate version of a course, that previously met QM Standards, against all Specific Review Standards in the Higher Education Rubric. Examples: fully online/blended; 8week/16 week; multiple developers; undergraduate/graduate level. Managed by a certified Course Review Manager (CRM) in compliance with QM Course Review Policies and Processes.

Review of an alternate version of a course, that previously met QM Standards, against all Specific Review Standards in the Higher Education Rubric. Examples: fully online/blended; 8week/16 week; multiple developers; undergraduate/graduate level. Managed by the QM Coordinator in compliance with QM Course Review Policies and Processes.

Review of a course in its entirety against all Specific Review Standards in the Higher Education Rubric. Managed by a certified Course Review Manager (CRM) in compliance with QM Course Review Policies and Processes.